compassion, collaboration & cooperation iN transistion
IS about a transition between belief systems. THE transition that
takes place between an OLD ORDER and a NEW ORDER MINDSET.
Anyone who is familiar with the thoughts that I have expressed,
over the years, in respect for the very difference between these
two juxtaposed MINDSETs, will no doubt have wondered and
very subject IS all about.
The one thing that can most certainly be stated, and in some instances
absolutely stated, IS that the DYSLEXIC MINDSET is unconventional,
unaccordant and unauthodox, as well as being, I would suggest,
was of course Winston Churchill - and no better proof of the continued
existence of the juxtaposition of the OLD versus the NEW ORDER mindsets
twixt the elitist self-serving minority, representative democracy
establishment, in control of the functional democracy of the people - was
provided by the ultimate systematic wiping from history of the so called
Churchill's Toyshop, by a bureaucracy jealous of its special treatment and
of its success, in the face of the inability of the system to appropriately
provide solutions at the time and in time, to an ever escalating and
increasingly complex set of problems. A situation which ALL life today, on
this pale blue dot, IS faced with on a planetary scale, just two generations
later, when the system bureaucracy chooses to ignore the advice of the
which indicates the importance of an acknowledgement of the capability of
the DYSLEXIC MINDSET to visualise the consequences of consequences of
complex systems, and acting as a catalyst, equally communicate
methodologies to develop appropriate solutions.
Even though the rate of mankind's technological achievement
has exploded since WWII, the system as a whole has garnered little
understanding of the importance of nurturing the dyslexic mind for the
ultimate benefit of the entirety of HumanKIND, or that just technology in
itself is enough to supply the ultimate solutions to the complexities of our
collective problems. The computer-generated information superhighway
could launch a new renaissance of creativity for millions of visual thinkers!
Some of the greatest minds in politics, science, literature, and the arts
experienced undetected learning disabilities that stopped them from
assimilating information the same way as their peers. Some of our most
original intellects Albert Einstein, Thomas Edison, Lewis Carroll, and
Winston Churchill relied heavily on visual modes of thought, processing
information in terms of images instead of words or numbers.
“The Zen Leader is an important and very helpful book in the science and art of leadership. Based on everything from Zen to Integral Philosophy, it outlines 10 fundamental “shifts” or “flips” that can move you from small mind to Big Mind, bringing an expanding capacity of leadership with each one. Give it a try, and see for yourself!”
"There are leaders and those who lead - leaders hold a
position of power or authority but those who lead inspire
us - whether individuals or organisations, we follow those
who lead not because we have to but because we want to.
We follow those who lead NOT for them but for OURSELVES."
AS Andrew Cohen stated during a dialogue with Deepak Chopra -
"WE ARE going to have to be willing - in all our imperfection - to
embrace leadership and to really BE exemplars of what’s possible."
AS I have often said elsewhere IT IS the MIS-interpretation and
MIS-understanding, on the part of those in the past who have declared their own interpretation of WHAT IS, that has blinded those very people to the very fact that WHAT IS - IS - and sure ain't NO ISER; and that its not for them to tell others how to think but for each and every one of us to think for ourselves …
by a process of disconnecting the mechanism of interpretation !
That WAS Buddha's message. Unfortunately the vast majority of his followers MIS-understood that message and through MIS-interpretation formulated a variety of buddhist mindsets which others now “connect” with ZEN.
In the context of your discussion here I would say that a non-philisophical interpretation of Ubuntu - IS - and as such sits in the same mind-space as ZEN but my own interpretation of ZEN, which I am willing to debate with anyone who wishes to do so, IS an interpretation which accepts that ZEN, as the mindset which Buddha alluded to, IS ONE which accepts that …
ZEN is TAO and NOT ZEN without TAO
ZEN is BUDDHA and NOT ZEN without BUDDHA
TAO & BUDDHA are independent & of ZEN
ZEN is dependent on TAO & BUDDHA as ONE
ibso facto …
IF the next Buddha IS a collective …
then the practice of Ubuntu IS HOW WE SIT: TOGETHER as ONE
Add a Comment