compassion, collaboration & cooperation iN transistion
EVOLUTION v REVOLUTION
“All men are born free and equal in dignity and rights”
Is it not the case, however, that rights only - ” follow on “ - ” return “ - ” happen as a reaction to the ACTION of assuming RESPONSIBILITY - in the manner of what goes around comes around ? - I am therefore of a mind that we should consider the responsibilities of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness - as a priority from which RIGHTS then follow on.
Equally is it NOT the case that - Rights speak to the EGO and Revolution - and that Responsibility speaks to the “authentic SELF” and Evolution ?
If as Andrew Cohen has said - human incarnation is not intended to be living to fulfil the desires of ego - but individual responsibility to switch, as a result of the activation of conscious choice, to assuming the burden of positive & qualitative evolution - and that that switch is a big thing - and furthermore that - there is an elegant simplicity to all I'm saying …
it's very satisfying … it's very simple really … it's not complicated … it just takes time for people to get it … when you get it it's very simple ….
.. it is surely this switch between the perception of rights and responsibilities which must be applied to the whole of the Argus Declaration of Sovereignty and then it would truly become a manifesto of universal parcipitative action rather than the message of a cult committed to the correction of what some might say is the most advanced culture in human history.
First published by Michael Grove @zaadz on 3rd October 2006
Re: EVOLUTION v REVOLUTIONcHAngeL [no longer around] said Mar 17, 2008, 12:33 PM:
Add a Comment